Trump's AI decree: The fight against Woke technologies is sparked!

Trump's AI decree: The fight against Woke technologies is sparked!

Washington, D.C., USA - On July 24, 2025, the White House took decisive steps to fundamentally regulate artificial intelligence (AI) in the USA. A decree signed by President Donald Trump aims to exclude the "Woke Ki" and ensure that the models used for government applications are ideologically neutral. This swivel not only represents the US government's approach to the AI, but also raises a number of questions regarding censorship, bias and the possible consequences for technological development. While US ACI such as Openaai emphasize that this step could accelerate development, there are serious concerns that it could endanger the innovation in the AI area.

The new regulation has clear guidelines: The use of AI in the public sector must not suffer from ideological prejudices that are colored by diversity, equality and inclusion (dei). These ideologies would endanger the quality and accuracy of the results supplied by AI, since the representation of the breed and gender could be manipulated. An example of this is AI models that change historical figures in their racial or gender membership or even suppress the representation of achievements of certain groups. According to [BPB], distortions are serious problems that should not be ignored in the AI debate.

The challenges of regulation

The regulation of AI is basically complex and raises many questions. The USA's approach could be called Laissez-Faire, while other countries such as China issue rigorous regulations. A global context shows that there is no uniform legal framework for AI. Most existing regulations are fragmented and offer insufficient answers to the challenges that arise from generative AI technologies. [BPB] emphasizes that the regulatory issues are relevant, especially with regard to fundamental rights and democratic processes.

The new decree is commissioned to manage the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to create guidelines for compliance with the "Unziased Ai Principles" within 120 days. These principles require large voice models (LLMS) that they work truthfully and ideologically neutral. Critics, including Mark Lemley from Stanford University, warn of the possible discrimination against views and the vague definitions of "truth search" and "ideological neutrality", which offer a wide range of interpretation and ultimately could hinder development. [TechCrunch] emphasizes that there are also expert opinions that note that there is no objective truth and impartial results are almost impossible to achieve.

competition and consequences for industry

The regulation also has an immediate impact on the competitive landscape in the AI industry. Companies like Xai under the direction of Elon Musk, who position themselves as less biased, could benefit from the ban on "Woker KI". At the same time, experts like Chowdhury say that it is possible that AI companies will adapt their training data to follow the political line and to secure federal funds. This could lead to a chilling effect that limits the creative freedom of the developers.

US technology companies are already working closely with the Ministry of Defense; Contracts worth up to $ 200 million are in the Macht. While this cooperation offers additional incentives, it is unclear which companies are best positioned in the long term in order to benefit from the new framework conditions. The uncertainty in relation to future regulations could mean that companies have to have a good knack more than ever in order to successfully act in this competitive environment.

Overall, it can be seen that the discourse on AI and its regulation not only has technological, but also social and political dimensions. The course that the United States runs under the current decree could result in far -reaching consequences for the development and application of artificial intelligence. The debate has opened and it remains to be seen how the industry and society will adapt to these new challenges.

For further information about the new regulation and its background, read more at [TechCrunch], [Whitehouse] or [BPB].