Schwankende Wähler: Flut an Anzeigen – Macht es einen Unterschied?
In Pennsylvania, wo der Wahlkampf ins nächste digitale Stufenlicht rückt, werden junge Wähler wie Hayden Cook von einer Flut an politischen Werbung überrollt – trotz bereits gefestigter Entscheidungen könnte das Milliarden-Dollar-Werbegeschäft die Wahl entscheidend beeinflussen!
In the lead-up to the 2024 U.S. presidential election, political advertising is set to soar past $10 billion, a staggering 20-25% increase from the previous election cycle. With critical battlegrounds like Pennsylvania taking center stage, nearly $1 billion will be funneled into ads, including $450 million focused on the fierce race between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris. Young voters, such as 19-year-old Hayden Cook, are feeling the overwhelming presence of campaign ads in their daily lives, often encountering them at work and despite efforts to block them online.
As the race heats up, Harris boasts a significant fundraising advantage, holding $235 million compared to Trump’s $135 million, and her campaign’s ad spending has far exceeded that of her rival. However, experts warn that while advertising can energize supporters, it risks alienating undecided voters. As both campaigns focus on critical issues like the economy, Trump targets Harris over fracking in Pennsylvania, where natural gas production is paramount. Political analysts anticipate that the current ad frenzy could deepen the divisions among voters, with more precise targeting expected in future elections. For additional insights, see details from www.bbc.com.
